閉じる


Preface

In the previous publication, the massive release of 239-plutonium from Unit 4 of Fukushima DNPP was revealed and I offered the most effective advice to counterargue the dismissal by the judge on Class Action of 420 unfortunate sailors of USS Ronald Reagan on "Operation Tomodachi".
Despite the various efforts to reach them, direct contact is yet to be made. As their symptom seems to show acute toxicity of 239-Pu, I feel pressed to tell them that as quickly as possible because neither medical doctors nor lawyers did not notice that they were internaly exposed to alpha emitters.
I learnt quite recentry and was surprised that most people don't know that a geiger counter can not detect alpha wave. It is not likely that USS Ronald Reagan was equipped with a detector for alpha ray.

http://p.booklog.jp/book/120197/read

 

The publication also made it clear the trick how IAEA made Fukushima radiation disaster look insignificant, that is,
1) they calculated radiation release only from core inventories of Unit 1, 2 and 3. 
2) they excluded the release from spent fuel pools of Unit 1, 2, and 3.
3) they completely ignored Unit 4, SFP of which stored 1,535 fuel rods of  3,000 fuel rods in total.
4) In addition to this, the release from the reactor core and equipment pool of Unit 4 was hidden.

The last item was not discussed in the previous publication but as I want you to understand the objective of this book quickly, please read part of the letter I sent to a US senator.    

 

Excuse me, sir but would you please help Fukushima radiation victims, 420 US sailors of USS Ronald Reagan who suffered acute inhalation toxicity of 239-plutonium and Depleted Uranium released from the new type of MOX fuel during the mission of Operation Tomodachi for disaster relief of Fukushima Daichi Nuclear Power Plant accident of March 11, 2011?

 

The sudden surge of both 239-Pu in the atmosphere in California on March 24 and 234-U, a component of DU in Alaska on April 1 clearly indicates, together with multiple other scientific evidence, that the MOX fuel using weapon grade plutonium mixing with DU was covertly and experimentally manufactured in Unit 4 of Fukushima DNPP.

 

There are two research papers which show the fall out of 239-Pu, component of more than 90% of weapon grade plutonium, is 100 times that of Nagasaki A-bomb and more than 10 times the global fall out. The level monitored in California is like those values.

Based on the analysis of the official radiation plume dispersion map and the daily trail of USS Ronald Reagan, it is obvious that those sailors inhaled deadly alpha emitters such as 239-Pu and 234-U. Their symptoms, as far as the observation in the documentary film goes, resemble to the acute toxicity of 239-Pu observed in animal studies carried out during Manhattan Project.

Nine sailors were already dead but their Class Action for compensation against Tepco was dismissed by
U.S. District Judge Janis Sammartino in San Diego on January 4 this year on the ground that the sailors have provided no information to support an assertion that TepCo knew its actions would cause harm likely to be suffered in California.

Please be noted;

There is a delicate issue which I didn’t mention in the book because I thought that they would fight without touching on that issue.

That is;

 

1) 239Pu released from Fukushima is deemed as the logical and circumstantial consequence that it was part of 331Kg of weapon grade plutonium the US lent Japan for the research and development purpose decades ago. It had been kept at Tokai Village in a different facility but was moved to Unit 4.

 

2) IAEA says that Unit 4 was halted operation on November 30, 2010 to remove 1331 fuel rods of the reactor core to spent fuel pool (SFP). It also says there were 204 new assemblies, components of which have never been disclosed. However, as you saw in the Part 2, there was heat signature in the reactor core, equipment pool as well as SFP meaning that they were using Unit 4 to make the MOX fuel in question.

2) 234U detected in Alaska is most likely from equipment pool which had stored fresh Depleted Uranium with higher concentration of 234-U achieved through the process of enrichment of used uranium.  

 

3) As Senator may know it very well, the US and Russia agreed to reduce the excessive weapon grade plutonium in 2000 but they changed the reduction method in 2010 called 2010 protocol.
I know it is a serious allegation, but I presume that the US government asked Japan to experimentally manufacture the MOX fuel using 331Kg for that purpose.

4) It was January 2014 that I had a strong doubt that part or whole 331Kg had gone from Unit 4 when Mr. Obama pressured Japan through media for its return. Mr. Abe, PM of Japan promised in March to give it back, but it took two full years to ship it from Japan March 2016 arriving at Savannah River Site in June.

 

The seriousness of the covert operation and violation of non-proliferation on top of the huge amount of radiation release is the reason why Unit 4 had to be covered up.   

 


Cover up still continues

On March 17, 2018, NHK Special entitled "Abberence for two days; Reasons of cooling water reduction" was broadcasted. 
https://www.facebook.com/gomizeromirai/videos/2070506202989506/?fref=mentions&pnref=story

Let's see how they did using some chart I posted at Facebook. 


 

It is obvious that there is rising steam from Unit 4.

 
However, they put caption only for Unit 2 and Unit 3 in Japanese. They ignore Unit 4 despite the rising steam even in this screen. 


 

They also ignore 1000 mSv/h of Unit 4 at 10:00AM on March 15 clearly stated in IAEA Report explaind in the revious book and the high level of radiation in gold color of March 15, they say, attribute to the breach of core container of Unit 2 and pressure buildup in core container of Unit 3. 

 

In addition, they hide the high does level of March 15. Take a look at the circle carefully. 

 

Then don't show the day 16.
It is useless because such FOIA document is available but they bravely depend on the overwhelming majority who don't know anything about FOIA document.


NHK knows that I know about Unit 4 because I sent a letter to Chairman in December last year and Mr. Edano, Cabinet Secretary at the time of the Fukushima accident and now the leader of Cinstitutional Democratic Party. 


It must be easy to deceive the public only if you have a good mouth piece like media.
I am not cynical but I can't help thinking that the democracy is a system where the public is deluded.
There was a popular chant for the demonstration against Security Act two years ago; "What is democracy?" to invite the response of the crowd to raise various placards such as "I AM NOT ABE".
 
Unless the public gain insight into the deceit of the power, democracy would never come. This is the honest feeling I have through the research of Unit 4 over four years.

If people have the basic of deductive inference, it won't be that difficult to look through things.

 


Motivation and need of cover up

I did not talk about their entire strategy of Fukshima cover up in the previous book because it would make the Class Action a little too complicated for the attorney to handle.

 

The table was made from day to day record of IAEA Technical Report on Uni 4.

The cover up of the radiation release from Unit 4 was not the strategy but reactive decision.

 

The daily record of Mar 16 shows their alleged confirmation from heicopter that there was sufficient water in the Unit 4 spent fuel pool to cover the fuel assemblies is the only ground to claim of "no radiation release from Unit 4".

Even US NRC(nuclear reguraory committee) officials, according to the FOIA document, were skeptical about the confirmation from helicopter but let's take what IAEA report states as it is.

 

However, even if there was water, more than 1000mSv radiation was recorded on March 15 and water temperature at 4 AM of March 14 was 84℃ and there was neither cooling nor water injection for the next five days. It was ovious that water was boiled to vapor to reduse the water level. And fuel assemblies to expose to air either burn the zilcon coating or plutonium inside, eight times larger than zilcon in thermal expansion rate, destroys the coating to make plutonium oxide by air contact. Thus, even if the confirmation from helicopter was true, radiation particles were released from SFP.          

 

Now let's discuss the entire cover up strategy before going to another important issue of 234-uranium detected in Alaska.

1) Motivation and reason of the cover up 
 
To make a long story short, read from Item 1) through 4) at first.  
 

1) 239Pu released from Fukushima is deemed that it was part of 331Kg of weapon grade plutonium the US lent Japan for the research and development purpose decades ago. It had been kept at Tokai Village in a different facility but was transfered to Unit 4.

 

2) IAEA says that Unit 4 was halted operation on November 30, 2010 to remove 1331 fuel rods of reactor core to spent fuel pool (SFP). It also says there were 204 new assemblies, components of which have never been disclosed. However, there was heat signature in reactor core, equipment pool as well as SFP meaning that they were using Unit 4 to make the new type of MOX fuel which we will discuss after this section.

3) 234U detected in Alaska is most likely from equipment pool which had stored fresh Depleted Uranium with higher concentration of 234-U achieved through the process of enrichment of used uranium.  

 

4) The US and Russia agreed to reduce the excessive weapon grade plutonium in 2000 but they changed the reduction method in 2010 called 2010 protocol.
I presume that the US government asked Japan to experimentally manufacture MOX fuel of 2010 protocol using 331Kg prior to the production at Savannah River Site.

5) It was January 2014 that I have a strong doubt that part or whole 331Kg had gone from Unit 4 when Mr. Obama pressured Japan through media for its return. Mr. Abe, PM of Japan promised in March to give it back, but it took two full years to ship it from Japan March 2016 arriving at Savannah River Site in June.

In order to understand the motivation, your full assessment of Item 1) and 4) is necessary. 

Take a look at the chronology of events and then read item 4) again.

2013 09 07  Tokyo Olympic award
2013 12 06  Security regulation act approved at the Diet
2014 03 26  Abe promised to give it back
       ・   
       ・ How come did it take two full years?  
       ・
       ・
2016 03 23  Shipped from Japan            
2016 05 15  Arrived in Charleston 
2016 06 04  Depated Charleston 
2016 06 06  Arrived at Savannah River Site  
       
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When Mr. Obama pressed Japan for its return through madia, I thought it was strange because it was just "(the US)give it back and (Japan) we will do by when" kind of thing.

Then, China put pressure on Japan to meet Obama's request as quickly as possibe, three times during the very short period of time through Global Times and Xinhua and the answer of Mr. Amano, Japanese Director General of IAEA on March 5 was more than strange. He said that the agency could ensure Japan's nuclear material is for peaceful use.

It was not the answer to the issue.  His comment assured my doubt of Item 4). 

You can read Chinese response, the same as mine, to Amano's comment here.

 
Are you sure now that the release of weapon grade plutonium from Unit 4?
You can't make a plausible explanation otherwise to satisfy all of these facts; 

1) more than 10 times the global fall out of 239-Pu 
2) fall out of unnatural 234-U which is not a component of ordinary MOX fuel, which was allegedly storerd in SFP of Unit 3, because it does not use Depleted Uranium
3) full two years blank period between Mr. Abe's promise to give it back and shipment from Japan
4) shipping route from England to Japan and to Charleston in the US staying there for 19 days then to Svannah River Site. 
 
If  the whole 331Kg had gone, "the replacement of 236Kg UK origin and 2Kg French (3Kg in the memo is author's mistake) was shipped from England and 93 Kg US origin was loaded at Charleston" is a natural doubt any one may have for this unusual shipping route. 
 
As Charleston facility is used to make some nuclear wepons, it may not be illogical to think that 93 Kg was loaded there although I am not sure on this;
This is its function in 70's; 
Receipt of missiles from the fleet, disassembly, refurbishment and functional tests continued as required to support fleet needs. During its years of service, POMFLANT has cycled missiles through assemblyand test well over 4,000 times. It remains the only facility at which all five generations of FBM missiles have been processed. It has had all the FIRSTS and has always met fleet requirements. 
 

In addition to the release of huge amount of weapon grade plutnium and Depleted Uranium, covert manufacturing of MOX fuel at Unit 4 are clear violation against non-proliferation and it must be disgrace for the US if the world knows the truth. 


This is the motivation or reason to cover up Fukushima. 
Fukushima was not the accident of nuclear power plant only.  

 


Who has made Fukushima radioative disater look insignificant?

The implementation of any strategy takes steps.
Chronological assessment of major events is a simple but powerful method to find out the major elements to build the entire strategy.

Unless you do this analysis, you may miss the most important point you have to address to.
 
The chart below is a simple chronology of major events. 

I know there were many people who complained of Abe's "under control speech" a lie.  However, unless you know events took place before and after the speech, which may have something to do with it,  you would not know what to do with his lie but complaining.      

The motivation to cover up Fukushima is now clear but the motivation can't mobilize people because unless specific objectives to work on are shown to them clearly they can' t move. The motivation of a person in power and its stake holders (a group of elites) can not be shared by other people automatically. The strategy comes in here to organize people and let them achieve the set objectives in their specific area of expertise. It is very important to realize that there is no direct connection between the motivation of the power and that of people to achieve specific obejectives in their capacity. 
 
This is why there are many contradictions in IAEA Technical Report such as honest statement of 1000 mSv measurement in Unit 4 and honest SFP temperature statement of 84℃ of March 14.
If they worked with the same motivation and are excellent enough not to overlook contradictions, there would be no chance for ordinary people like myself to find such incredible mistakes or contradictions for us to fight back against the power.
They are, even work for the power, more or less the same as the rest of us in terms of morality and competency.  
Thus, it is indispensable to learn and analyse "people and organization" behind the power who acts on specific objectives.
As they don't necessarily know the intention of cover up and whole scope of strategy for it, there would be a big chance to find contradictions which may lead to the total collapse of the entire strategy.  
 
This is 2014 photograph of UN Science Committee members
 

 

2)Who has made Fukushima radioative disater look insignificant?

 

The following slides were used at the US EPA presentation to Japanese authority on May 19, 2012, 14 months after the Fukushima accident. This is the kick off of the inplementation of the cover up strategy.

 

 

 

One of two major objectives of the presentation was to promote Hormesis theory among general public. Hormesis is a controversial concept to claim that low level radiation exposure does not pose any significant health hazards and some even say that it is good for the health. 

A limited number of power elite knew how bad the radiation from Fukushima was and therefore, they thought they would have to raise the annual permissible limit of radiation exposure from 1 mSv to 20 mSv, for which they needed hoax Hormesis theory.  

 

 

The next three slides are about communication manual how to relieve the fear among people using psychological technique. 

  

 

"Tell the most important message at the begining and repeat it at the end"・・・right. 

 

 

Americans love this kind of expression using Equation of Relativity ending up with cash. Yes, money solves all the problems, damn right.

 

 

 

"Don't worry too much. Fukushima is not as bad as you think" is the point of the presentation to pass on this message to the public.

What we must know is that US Environment Protection Agency(EPA)was hijacked by Nuclear cowboy, which means that the agency was bowed down to the nuclear industry.


World Nuclear ssociation

Ms. Agneta Rising of the World Nuclear Association delivered a speech in Taiwan on September 26, 2013, 19 days after Mr. Abe's infamous "Fukushima under control" speech at the IOC convention for 2020 Tokyo Olympic games. The image is linked to YouTube.

 

After the talk about the necessity of nuclear power plant, she speaks on Fukushima at 26 minutes.

Her message is shown in the following three screen shots;

 

Neither death nor injury by the damage of nuclear power plants.(Death and injury were caused by earthquake and tsunam)

 

 

Radiation release from the power plants is not large enough to cause health hazards.

 

 

 

However、psychology of people to fear radiation disrupted people's life.

 

 

 

As you recognize, her talk is the same as that of EPA presentation how to solve people's general concern about radiation.

The nuclear industry dismissd at this point the potential risk of Fukushima radiation disaster

 

Agneta Rising's discourse is before two IAEA interim reports published in October and December, 2013 and six months before UNSCEAR Report made public on April 2, 2014.

US EPA and the nuclear industry made Fukushima finished before the public report by international organizations.

 

And the summary of the United Nation's report was amazing;

 

子供たちは大人よりも放射線に敏感なので、原子力発電所の事故後の主なリスクは、幼い子供たちがヨウ素131を吸収して甲状腺に蓄積され、甲状腺がんになる可能性があることだ。この極めて稀な病気は治療可能でその治療成功例は多い。しかし、潜在的疾患可能性を調べるために年齢18歳までの子供たち36万人を超音波検査を行っているところである。

Children are more vulnerable than adults to the effects of radiation and after a nuclear accident, the principal risk is for the youngest children to absorb iodine-131 which would accumulate in the thyroid gland, increasing the chance of thyroid cancer. This rare disease is treatable with a high success rate, but to guard against potential extra cases the thyroid glands of some 360,000 young people up to the age of 18 are being surveyed by ultrasound.
原子放射線の影響に関する国連科学委員会(UNSCEAR)は、“一回目の(甲状腺の)小節、シスト、がん発生の増加が観察されたが、検査精度の向上から予期された程度であった。福島事故の影響のない地域における同様の検査データから見て、福島県の子供たちに見られる甲状腺がんの発現率は高いが、それは放射線被爆と無関係である。
UNSCEAR said, "Increased rates of detection of nodules, cysts and cancers have been observed during the first round of screening; however, these are to be expected in view of the high detection efficiency. Data from similar screening protocols in areas not affected by the accident imply that the apparent increased rate of detection among children in Fukushima prefecture are unrelated to radiation exposure."
”野生生物と近辺のエコシステムへの影響は、人間の健康に対して予見したものと同程度のものであった。高度汚染水が放出された区域、及び原発工場の隣接環境から遠く離れたい地域への影響はないと思われる。さらに、その隣接地帯であっても影響は一時的なものである。広大な太平洋の生物全体に対して“影響はあっても、大したものではない”」と委員会は報告した。
Effects on wildlife and nearby ecosystems were similar in magnitude to the predicted human health impact. UNSCEAR said it expected no effects beyond the areas where highly radioactive water was released - i.e. the immediate environs of the plant itself. Even there the effects would be "transient" it said. In the wider area of the Pacific Ocean, "the potential for effects on biota is insignificant."
UN reports on Fukushima radiation」(02 April 2014)

 

Surprised at this report, I checked who are authoritative members of the UN scientific committee;

Japanese Rapporteurs are Mr. Yoshiharu Yonekura, Director of National Institute of Radiological Science and Kazunori Kodama, Chief researcher of Radiation Effects Research Foundation.
What? 
They are Japanese government itself, aren't they?
UN Scientic Committee? Authoritative committee?・・・Is this the end of Fukushima?・・・ Wow, it surely makes people of Fukushima happy・・・   

 

Despite the fact that Radiation Effects Research Foundation published "Vision 2012" on-line stating that as they could not accommodate the anxiety of people because they have only external exposure data, they will strive to become the world research and education center for chronical effects of not only atomic bomb but also of general radioactivity based on the accumulated knowledge in the past. 

 

Vision 2012 also committed to clarify the risk of the low radiation exposure including internal exposure and to fulfill the lack of internal exposure data by international cooperation to collect more data to respond to the request of people of Fukushima.

The Vision is self explanatory that this Cooperative Japan-US Research Organization admits the data they have is insufficient to address the internal exposure risk assessment

 
As it was 2014 when I read "Vision 2012" in Wikipedia, I should keep their statement in Japanese as a record for possible argument in the future. 

  
しかもですよ、”放射線影響研究所が外部被曝研究のデータのみで、福島第一原発事故による福島県民の内部被曝の不安に応える事が出来なかった事から、放射線影響研究所の新たな方針として過去の業績と蓄積した資料を使い、原爆に限らず一般の放射線の慢性影響に関する世界の研究教育センターを目指し、「放射線影響研究所将来構想2012」を出した。将来構想では、内部被曝を含めた低線量被曝のリスク解明し、現在日米共同機関を将来の課題として国際的組織にして、被爆者情報のデータベース化して国内外の研究者に開放し、共同研究で放射線影響研究所に少ない内部被曝のデータ収集をして、福島県民の不安に応えられるようにしていくとしている。”(ウィキペディア)とある。

While they say they have not enough data, the committee says on the other hand that children of Fukushima have no problem? 

Who on earth can believe the conclusion of the UN report?   
Let's keep this blog in Japanese as a record, too.

2014.04.06「プルトニウムの予告編:副題の”これでお終い?

 

This organizational overview clearly tells us that World Nuclear Association, United Nation and IAEA are the same institution as far as nuclear issue is concerned. 
This is the background behind Mr. Abe's "Fukushima under control" speech.
 
Yes, 2020 Tokyo Olympic is the final step of Fukushima cover up strategy. If it is held as they planned, Fukushima is going to be a history.
Do you people want make Fukushima a history? 
According to the research paper of 10 times the world fall out of 239-plutonium quoted earlier, authors predict that the radiation peak will come in 2080. You can't make it a history because Fukushima is on going Hiroshima and Nagasaki in much more disasterous magnitude
 
There are technologies to mitigate radiation pollution in the environment more effectively by using microbes and other biological means.
However, if the cover up remains unrevealed, there would be no substantial changes beyond today's mimitigation programs. 
 
Fukushima is a crisis but it is also the opportunity for all of us to work together to solve the problem for our children and their children.
What happend is what happened.
We now know who are behind the cover up but don't need to blame them. Instead, we must let them work harder for the mitigation and let them pay the expenses for it. That is their responsibility.         
 
There is conspiracy in this world we live in but conspiracy theory is something diffrent. Some may take this a conspiracy theory but there are quite interesting things regarding the award to Tokyo. 
 


読者登録

HideoJapanさんの更新情報・新作情報をメールで受取りますか?(読者登録について